First Name*
Last Name*
Please rank from 1-5 the Environmental Protection Agency on whether it should receive the most significant budget cuts first (1 being highest priority, 5 being lowest priority). 1 1 2 3 4 5
Please rank from 1-5 the Federal Bureau of Investigation on whether it should receive the most significant budget cuts first (1 being highest priority, 5 being lowest priority). 1 1 2 3 4 5
Please rank from 1-5 the Department of Education on whether it should receive the most significant budget cuts first (1 being highest priority, 5 being lowest priority). 1 1 2 3 4 5
Please rank from 1-5 the Department of Housing and Urban Development on whether it should receive the most significant budget cuts first (1 being highest priority, 5 being lowest priority). Select an option 1 2 3 4 5
Please rank from 1-5 the Department of State on whether it should receive the most significant budget cuts first (1 being highest priority, 5 being lowest priority). Select an option 1 2 3 4 5
Do you support the following real-life uses of taxpayer dollars? $45 million for a “diversity and inclusion” scholarship in Burma. Somewhat Supportive Not supportive Somewhat supportive Very supportive
Do you support the following real-life uses of taxpayer dollars? $3 million for “girl-centered climate action” in Brazil. Somewhat supportive Not supportive Somewhat supportive Very supportive
Do you support the following real-life uses of taxpayer dollars? $125 million to push critical race theory in public health policy. Somewhat supportive Not supportive Somewhat supportive Very supportive
Do you support the following real-life uses of taxpayer dollars? $280,000 for “diverse” bird watcher groups. Somewhat supportive Not supportive Somewhat supportive Very supportive
Do you support the following real-life use of taxpayer dollars? $3 million for “girl-centered climate action” in Brazil. Somewhat supportive Not supportive Somewhat supportive Very supportive
Do you support the following real-life use of taxpayer dollars? $125 million to push critical race theory in public health policy. Somewhat supportive Not supportive Somewhat supportive Very supportive
Do you support the following real-life use of taxpayer dollars? $280,000 for “diverse” bird watcher groups. Somewhat supportive Not supportive Somewhat supportive Very supportive
Do you support the following real-life use of taxpayer dollars? $3,267,000 to build a transgender health guide website meant to “increase access to gender-affirming care,” also known as mutilation. Somewhat supportive Not supportive Somewhat supportive Very supportive
Do you support the idea of a ‘DOGE dividend’ where all American taxpayers will receive a portion of the savings from DOGE cuts? Undecided Yes No Undecided
What do you think of DOGE’s cuts so far? Undecided Yes No Undecided
Submit my survey 